Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 7, 2006No. 93,640PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.:

Charles Adams appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine, conspiracy to sell cocaine, attempted sale of cocaine, possession of hydromorphone, possession of marijuana, and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia. Because the admission of hearsay testimony from an informant violated Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177, 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004), and the Confrontation Clause to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, we reverse Adams’ conviction for attempted sale of cocaine, set aside his sentence on that count, and remand for a new trial…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Sean Lamont CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. AraujoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. AraujoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. BrockenshireCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API