Legal Opinion

Danaho Refining Co. v. Dietz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1964No. 45PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The parties will be designated as in the trial court.

Six plaintiffs, former employees of defendant, joined in one petition to bring suit for breach of an alleged contract between defendant and its employees at its plant at Pettus, Bee County, Texas, by the terms of which, so plaintiffs allege, defendant became obligated to pay to each employee, including plaintiffs, an annual Christmas bonus equal to one month’s salary in lieu of a salary raise.

Four days after defendant filed its plea of privilege, a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. James v. DryeTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bates v. StinnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Farmer v. CassityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Appell Petroleum Corp. v. G. W. Townsend Lease ServiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Montgomery v. GibbensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Danaho Refining Company v. DietzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Dina Pak Corporation v. May Aluminum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Hayes v. BoulignyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Kunz Construction Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Kunz Construction Co. v. DebusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API