Danaho Refining Company v. Dietz
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Chief Justice.
Six plaintiffs, all former employees of appellant Danaho Refining Company, joined in one petition to bring suit for breach of a contract alleged to have been made in the latter part of 1952 between appellant and its employees at its plant near Beeville, Texas, to pay annually as a part of their salary or wages a Christmas bonus equal to one month’s salary. It was plaintiffs’ contention that this contract remained a binding legal obligation of defendant for the entire period of their employment, which terminated as to each in 1962, when defendant closed its plant in Bee…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Huff v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Culver v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Henshaw v. Texas Natural Resources FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tenneco Oil Company v. Padre Drilling CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Lone Star Steel Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- First National Bank in Dallas v. ZimmermanTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Consolidated Engineering Co. v. Southern Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Wisznia v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.