Pabst Brewing v. Frederick P. Winner, LTD
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Pabst Brewing Company v. Frederick P. Winner, Ltd., No. 8, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – SUCCESSOR BEER MANUFACTURER – Maryland’s Successor Manufacturers Law defines a “successor beer manufacturer” to include “a person or license holder who replaces a beer manufacturer with the right to sell, distribute, or import a brand of beer.”
Md. Code Ann., Alco. Bev. § 5-201(a)(5) (2016). The Court of Appeals held that, in order to qualify as a successor beer manufacturer, a “person or license holder” must replace a beer manufacturer as the license holder with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Blackstone v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Macedo v. Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Rowe v. Md. Comm'n on Civil RightsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Balt. Police Dept. v. Open Justice Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Admin. Off. of the Courts v. Abell Fnd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- 108oag3, Maryland Attorney General Reports2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.