People v. Tognola
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
The defendant was charged jointly with one Heber Norton with the crime of robbery alleged to have been committed by forcibly taking from the person of one Lala Singh the sum of $10. Norton pleaded guilty. Upon trial evidence most persuasive of defendant’s guilt was adduced, upon which the jury rendered the following verdict: “We, the jury . . . find the defendant William Tognola guilty of robbery in the first degree, as charged in the information.”
Defendant claims: 1. That the verdict is inconsistent and void for uncertainty; 2. That it is the result of prejudice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. MolinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re ColfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. MercadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Wanee v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. O'NEALCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- State v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.