Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Baker

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 17, 2014No. 13-1641PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURKIN, District Judge.

Individuals convicted of sex offenses are required under federal and state law to register as a sex offender with the local law enforcement agency where they reside. Roy Baker has repeatedly chosen to ignore this requirement since the first time he sexually assaulted a woman in 1982. This habit caught up to him for the third time in May 2012 when he pled guilty to a single count of failing to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). The district judge sentenced Baker to 77 months’ imprisonment, followed by a life term of supervised release. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Frank J. Bonanno and Lawrence J. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Shawn SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Charles GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. John Bloch, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Charles ArmourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Miranda-SotolongoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Jeffrey P. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API