Legal Opinion
United States v. John Bloch, III
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 17, 2016No. 15-1648PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant John W. Bloch III has had three sentencing hearings in four years. He now seeks a fourth. Bloch argues he is entitled to such relief because the district court committed error in imposing the length and conditions of supervised release.
The third time happens to be a charm in this instance though, as Bloch is not entitled to another sentencing hearing. The district court not only adequately explained its justification for imposing a term of supervised release, it also adopted a “best practice” suggested by this court for providing adequate notice to. defendants…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Scott AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Shawn SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Valerie FloresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Rosie DigglesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Michael AnglinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. GabrielCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.