Legal Opinion

Sports Courts of Omaha, Ltd. v. Meginnis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1993No. S-90-546PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Sports Courts of Omaha, Ltd., sued Harry W. Meginnis, Jr., as a comaker of a promissory note to Sports Courts. The district court for Lancaster County granted summary judgment to Meginnis on three bases, one of which is the 3-month statute of limitations contained in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1013 (Reissue 1990) of the Nebraska Trust Deeds Act.

Sports Courts appeals and, referring to the statute of limitations issue, contends that the general 5-year statute of limitations, expressed in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-205 (Reissue 1989), governs the time limit for commencement of the action against Meginnis.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Huffman v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. CrowdellNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lemke v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Lincoln v. Norris Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Flora Ex Rel. Flora v. EscuderoNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Estate of WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API