Legal Opinion
Lemke v. Metropolitan Utilities District
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1993No. S-90-1010PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
In a negligence action brought under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1987), Lorraine B. Lemke and Kenneth H. Lemke obtained judgments against Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha (MUD), which has appealed.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
“A district court’s factual findings in a case brought under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act will not be set aside unless such findings are clearly incorrect.” Lynn v. Metropolitan Utilities Dist., 225 Neb. 121, 125, 403 N.W.2d 335, 338 (1987). Accord, Zeller v. County of Howard, 227 Neb. 667, 419 N.W.2d…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Socorro v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Larson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Estate of Pearson v. Interstate Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Jasa Ex Rel. Jasa v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- POPPLE BY POPPLE v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.