Legal Opinion

Heard v. Neighbor Newspapers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1989No. 46894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgment to a defendant newspaper in a libel action, based upon a holding that the publication of a report received from an investigator was privileged by virtue of OCGA § 51-5-7 (7). Heard v. Neighbor Newspapers, 190 Ga. App. 756 (380 SE2d 279) (1989). We granted certiorari upon the following inquiry:

Is information from a welfare fraud investigator as to what transpired in court conditionally privileged? If so, is a fact issue as to malice created by the reporter’s failure to check this information?

Factual Background

1. A grand jury indicted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Southeastern Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Heard v. Neighbor Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Wooten v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Metro Properties v. City of DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jack T. Hammer v. Edward L. Slater, Loretta Slater, Herbert Jaffess, Renee JaffessCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Munoz v. American Lawyer Media, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Smith v. Chatham CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Resnik v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Talbert v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API