Legal Opinion

Resnik v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1992No. A92A0073PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

A jury found in favor of Billy Pittman in his personal injury suit against Howard Resnik. The trial court granted Pittman’s motion to include prejudgment interest pursuant to OCGA § 51-12-14 in the final judgment. Resnik appeals, challenging only the award of prejudgment interest.

The record establishes that appellee sent a letter by certified mail to Carole Barnaby, a claims representative at St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, which provided that “[t]his letter shall constitute written notice to [St. Paul] and its insureds, the Resniks[,] for unliquidated damages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. RunionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Regency Nissan, Inc. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Heard v. Neighbor Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Barbush v. OilerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Cook v. NC Two, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Bennett v. MullallyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Long Leaf Industries, Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. American Golf Corp. v. ManleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API