State v. Tenaska Alabama Partners, LP
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
On August 10, 2001, Tenaska Alabama Partners, L.P. ("Tenaska") sued the Alabama Department of Revenue ("the Department") in the Autauga Circuit Court, challenging the Department's classification and assessment of Tenaska's property as "Class I property" for purposes of the State's ad valorem tax. The Department contended it had made the classification and assessment pursuant to § 217 and Amendments 325 and 373, Alabama Constitution 1901, and § 40-8-1(a), Ala. Code 1975. Tenaska argued that the classification, and thus the assessment, were erroneous and unconstitutional. The circuit court held…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. v. City of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Jansen v. State Ex Rel. DowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Siegelman v. Chase Manhattan BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- State v. the American Tobacco CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- State v. Colonial Pipeline Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hollis v. ForresterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Noble v. BakerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Weinrib v. WolterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Weinrib v. WolterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008