Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Forrester

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 29, 2004No. 2030500PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal concerns the proper application, to stipulated facts, of Ala. Code 1975, § 40-15-18, which provides, in pertinent part:

"Unless the decedent directs otherwise in his will, all estate taxes, whether state or federal, payable by reason of the death of the decedent, shall be paid by the executor or other personal representative out of the estate property and shall be a charge against the residue thereof, and the executor or other personal representative shall be under no duty to recover from anyone for the benefit of the estate the pro rata portion of the estate tax attributable to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baggett v. WebbCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Lary v. Flasch Business ConsultingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Firstar Trust Co. v. First National Bank of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cleveland v. Compass BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Perry v. State Personnel Bd.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bentley Systems, Inc. v. Intergraph Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte ForresterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Broadnax v. GriswoldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. In re Adoption of K.R.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API