Legal Opinion
Werlin Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1978No. 77-561PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The issues raised by the instant cause are whether the commission had the power to consider the terms of and apellantes activities under its 1967 contract with McKibben when it determined that appellant was not a proper party to receive a private motor carrier permit and whether the commission’s determination was supported by the evidence of record.2
Appellant argues in effect that the commission did not have the power to consider the terms of the contract with McKibben or its behavior under that contract because (1) R. C. 4921.04 does not grant the commission power to consider former behavior…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Delphos v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Gilbraith v. HixsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Columbus Southern Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.