Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reynolds v. W. S. Ranch Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1961No. 6726PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

The trial court dismissed an action by the state engineer seeking to enjoin appellee from the diversion or use of water of the Costilla Creek in Taos County, for irrigation and filling ponds and lakes above Costilla Reservoir, because of lack of indispensable parties and appellant appealed from the order of dismissal.

Appellant, the state engineer, alleged that appellee has been using water from Costilla Creek above Costilla Reservoir to fill certain fish ponds and for the irrigation of some 1300 acres of meadow or pasture land' above the reservoir; that neither appellee nor its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Tindal v. WesleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. City of Albuquerque v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Clinton Realty Co. v. ScarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Game Commission v. TackettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Meeker v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API