Smith v. Cram

It was not error to deny the two motions mentioned in the statement above. The suit did not abate by reason of the transfer of the interest of the defendants to the Bankers Discount Corporation : Or. L., § 38; Oregon Auto-Dispatch v. Gadweil, 67 Or. 301, 303, 304 (135 Pac. 880), and cases therein cited.

The principal contention of the appellants is the error of the court in admitting the testimony regarding the agreement between the parties to the mortgage at the time it was executed. Appellants state their principal contention on this appeal as follows:

“A witness cannot state impressions made…