Legal Opinion
Lebanon Steel Foundry v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 29, 1942No. 7990PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.
The question is narrow. Shortly, it is whether certain checkoff cards, signed by employees, constitute evidence of authority to bargain collectively.
It is stipulated the employees at petitioner’s plant in Lebanon, Pa., with certain exceptions, constitute an appropriate unit. Petitioner concedes that a majority of the employees in the unit signed the cards. The company declined, and still does, to recognize the cards as conferring authority to bargain. The Board has found them sufficient, has found also that the petitioner has been guilty of unfair labor practice in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Motor Bearing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. LundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Consolidated MacHine Tool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Ace-Alkire Freight Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Lowery Trucking Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Jim Henson Productions, Inc. v. John T. Brady & Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.