Legal Opinion

Eertmoed v. City of Pekin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1980No. 78-466PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell County dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse and remand.

Each of the plaintiffs in this case was a member of the Teamsters and Chauffeurs’ local union No. 627, and was employed by the sanitation department of the defendant city of Pekin pursuant to an oral contract between the union and the city. The terms and conditions of employment were partially set forth in a document entitled “Articles of Agreement” hereafter referred to as the Agreement. Article 4 of this Agreement set out in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dekam v. City of StreatorIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People ex rel. Stead v. Spring Lake Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Stahelin v. Bd. Ed. SD No. 4 DuPage CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. McGovern v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. City of HarrisburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lindahl v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Evans v. Benjamin School District No. 25Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Budka v. Board of Public Safety CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Kievman v. Edward HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Klekamp v. City of BurbankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API