Legal Opinion

Keeler v. Bell

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to recover for services performed as a referee in. an action in the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This is an action to recover for services performed as a referee in an action in the Supreme Court. After several days’ hearing and numerous adjournments in which there was no evidence taken by the referee, the attorneys in that action terminated the ease by stipulation for a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in that action. A judgment was entered against the defendant in the action, together with the costs and disbursements up to .the time of the stipulation. This arrangement was made without the knowledge or consent of the referee. In the entry of the judgment the referee’s fees were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bonynge v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Clark v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Little v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Thomas v. StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Tyrrel v. HammersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bottome v. NeelyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  2. Segal v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Zamir v. RottensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Finch v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API