Legal Opinion

Bottome v. Neely

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for $523.21, damages, and $34.31 costs, amounting altogether to $557.52, recovered for referee’s and stenographer’s fees, by the respondent, as assignee, against the appellants and one Marie L. Davies, on January 31, 1906, in .the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eleventh district, borough of Manhattan. The defendant Davies made default on trial and the above named appellants alone appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

All defendants were sued, as individuals. The appellants are, and have been since early in 1905, administrators of the estate of Agnes C. Taylor, deceased, who died intestate. In 1905, in New York county, in the Surrogate’s Court, said Davies obtained an order to show cause why the bond of said administrators should not be increased. The administrators opposed that motion, and the Surrogate’s Court, on its own motion, by order of July 11, 1905, directed a reference to John S. Jenkins, as referee, to take evidence and report with his opinion, with all convenient speed. The parties met — the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. LythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Bottome v. AlberstAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. Keeler v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bottome v. NeeleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Segal v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Eckman v. Pfeifer Oil Transportation Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API