Legal Opinion

Glink v. Pennell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1947No. 4041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION By WISEMAN, PJ.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Columbus, Ohio. The plaintiff brought an action in forcible entry and detainer, to which the defendant filed a demurrer claiming that the petition did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendant not desiring to plead further, the Court rendered judgment for the plaintiff.

The defendant has assigned as error the action of the trial court in overruling defendant’s demurrer to the petition and rendering judgment to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Snyder v. ReshenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  2. Bauer v. NeuzilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Ritchie v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Bumgarner v. OrtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Lester v. IsaacCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Asociación Cooperativa del Falansterio v. NavarroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  2. Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority v. StiresOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Asociación Cooperativa del Falansterio v. NavarroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API