Legal Opinion

Bedney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1996No. 93-CF-832PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted of distributing Dilaudid, a controlled substance, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1993). On appeal she contends that the trial court erred in (1) refusing to admit into evidence the prior recorded testimony of her co-defendant, who had previously pleaded guilty; (2) refusing to admit this same testimony under the hearsay exception for declarations against penal interest; (3) denying two defense requests for a continuance in order to locate the absent co-defendant; (4) permitting the government to impeach appellant with her post-arrest…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Laumer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Hutchinson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Lane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Thomas R. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API