Legal Opinion

McKarns v. Ohio Turnpike Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1953No. Nos. 325, 326, 327 and 328PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

This opinion deals with four separate but related appeals in turnpike condemnation proceedings. No. 325 is taken by J. Russel] McKarns and others from an order dismissing a demurrer, an answer and a cross-petition of such owners; No.

326 is taken by Edith B. Lehman and others from a similar order; No. 327 is taken by Millard C. Stacey and others from a similar order; and No. 328 is an appeal taken by Millard C. Stacey from an order overruling his motion seeking a vacation of an order assigning the cause for hearing on October 22, 1953, and for a stay of further proceedings pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kauer v. DefenbacherOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Sargent v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Emery v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of East Cleveland v. NauOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ornstein v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Appropriation by the Dir. of HighwaysOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Village of Lagrange v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. In Re Appropriation of EasementsOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. In re Appropriation of Easements of HulbertAshtabula County Court of Common Pleas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API