Legal Opinion

City of East Cleveland v. Nau

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1931No. 23143, 23144, 23145, 23146 and 23147PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

These cases, being similar in character, were tried together in the courts below. It was stipulated that the same evidence should be used in each. In both of the lower courts the several defendants in error recovered judgments against the city, the causes having been taken to the Court of Appeals and heard on appeal. The city prosecutes error from the judgments of the Court of Appeals, and the causes were argued together in this court.

The city of East Cleveland passed certain legislation extending a street known as Eddy road south of Euclid avenue in that city. The proposed extension provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of St. Marys v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. City of Springfield v. GrossOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. McKarns v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Solether v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Atwood Regional Water & Sewer Dist. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API