Legal Opinion

Bice v. Holmes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1944No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 42,642PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

In January, 1942, plaintiffs, as representatives of the estate of Charlotte Gr. Breitung, deceased, filed bill of complaint to quiet title .to mineral rights in certain lands in Iron county, to construe a certain instrument of conveyance, and to determine the rights of the several defendants in said lands. Defendants Herman Holmes and wife Christina Holmes and Louis Burridge and wife Edith Burridge filed answer and cross bill denying plaintiffs’ right to the relief sought and asserting claim to the mineral rights in a part of the lands. They appeal from a decree dismissing their cross bill…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Derham v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Thomas v. JewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ryan v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Glidden v. Beaverton Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. VanderWall v. MidkiffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Stadel v. Granger Brothers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Weisenburger v. KirkwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Peterson v. WillyardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API