Legal Opinion

Centrone v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eli Wager, J.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover damages from defendant and third-party plaintiff C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc. (Schmidt), which brews, bottles and distributes beer, and from defendant McCrory’s for injuries allegedly sustained when a glass bottle containing Schmidt’s beer exploded at a picnic sponsored by McCrory’s. It appears that no one has possession of the bottle’s fragments or its cap and that neither plaintiff nor Schmidt can identify the bottle’s manufacturer. Schmidt has commenced a third-party action against five manufacturers of glass…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  3. Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  5. Musco v. ConteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  2. Ashland v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Ashland v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Senart v. Mobay Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
  5. Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API