Legal Opinion
State v. Casteneda-Perez
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 20, 1991No. 24662-3-IPublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
Salvador Casteneda-Perez appeals his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.
Facts
The arrest of Casteneda-Perez arose out of a "controlled buy" by Seattle police officers on February 28, 1989. Officer Debbie Barnett testified that at approximately 6:30 p.m. on that date at the corner of Second and Pike in downtown Seattle, she approached Casteneda-Perez and asked him if he had some "coca". He replied, "Yes", and asked Barnett how much she wanted. She replied that she wanted $20 worth. At the time, Casteneda-Perez was standing in a group of people. Two-of the people in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. James RichterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- State v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HusonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- In re the Personal Restraint of GlasmannWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.