Legal Opinion
Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Hodel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1988No. 86-4389PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
The Northern Cheyenne Tribe (the Tribe) appeals from an amended injunction against the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary). The amended injunction is defended by the Secretary and by Thermal Energy, Inc. (Thermal), Wesco Resources, Inc. (Wesco), and Western Energy Co. (Western Energy). Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S. C. §§ 1331 and 1362. We hold that the injunction should be modified further and remand for this purpose.
BACKGROUND
In the aftermath of the Battle of Little Bighorn, the Northern Cheyenne moved to Montana. Virtually no white men inhabited the country. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bruce M. And Dorothy v. Cady v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Sierra Club v. John O. Marsh, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Delaware Audubon Society v. Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- King v. KingMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.