Piazza v. Little
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether an umbrella policy which provides automobile bodily injury liability coverage up to $1,000,000, but which by its terms excludes uninsured and underin-sured motorist coverage, is subject to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4) (1993 and Cum. Supp. 1997) and thus is required to offer UIM coverage.
I
At all times relevant to this case, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4) provided as follows:(b) [An] owner’s policy of liability insurance:
* * * *(4) Shall . . . provide underinsured motorist coverage, to be used only with a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Hendrickson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Progressive American Insurance v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. HaglerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999