Legal Opinion

Piazza v. Little

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1998No. COA97-743PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether an umbrella policy which provides automobile bodily injury liability coverage up to $1,000,000, but which by its terms excludes uninsured and underin-sured motorist coverage, is subject to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4) (1993 and Cum. Supp. 1997) and thus is required to offer UIM coverage.

I

At all times relevant to this case, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4) provided as follows:(b) [An] owner’s policy of liability insurance:

* * * *(4) Shall . . . provide underinsured motorist coverage, to be used only with a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Hendrickson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Progressive American Insurance v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. HaglerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API