Legal Opinion

Witt v. Klimm

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6491PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus.

The petitioners seek an order of this court compelling the Board of Health and Milk Inspection Service of the City and County of San Francisco to issue to them a permit to distribute and sell in San Francisco milk produced, pasteurized, and bottled in Colma, San Mateo County, California.

The facts are not in dispute and are briefly these: Petitioners are dealers in milk, which they produce, pasteurize and bottle at Colma, San Mateo County, California. They have applied for a permit to sell “Grade A Pasteurized Market Milk”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In Re IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Ex parte ShenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ex Parte JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. LaFranchi v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. City of Phoenix v. BreuningerArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Van Gammeren v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API