Legal Opinion

Harown v. Amazon

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided December 17, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01029Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MARY AIAD AGAIBY HAROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 3:20-cv-01029 v. ) Judge Trauger ) AMAZON, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Mary Aiad Agaiby Harown, a Tennessee resident, filed a pro se complaint against Amazon1 under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). (Doc. No. 1.) She also filed an application to proceed as a pauper. (Doc. No. 2.) The case is now before the court for a ruling on the application and initial review of the complaint. I. Application to Proceed as a Pauper The court may authorize…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API