Legal Opinion
Tercero v. Roman Catholic Diocese
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1999No. 18,717PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARMIJO, Judge.
{1} The formal opinion filed on December 28, 1998, is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted. The motion for rehearing filed by Defendant is denied.
{2} Plaintiff appeals from a district court order dismissing his claims against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Norwich, Connecticut (the Diocese), for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff alleges that the Diocese is liable for the alleged sexual abuse committed against him by Father Bernard Bissonnette, a priest ordained and incardinated in the Diocese. Plaintiff contends on appeal that New Mexico has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HiattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Insurance v. ConyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Santa Fe Technologies, Inc. v. Argus Networks, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Caba Ltd. Liability Co. v. Mustang Software, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002