Burnett v. Burnett
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lyle Brown, Justice.
Appellant’s motion to set aside a divorce decree was denied and she appeals. The chancellor found that more than ninety days had elapsed between the entry of the decree of divorce and the presentation of the motion, therefore concluding that the motion should be denied.
The petition for divorce was filed April 27, 1972, and personal service was had on June 7, 1972. Appellant did not appear or plead and a decree was entered on July 11, 1972. Some eight days before the expiration of ninety days, appellant filed a motion to set aside the decree. She alleged that she had been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- O'Neal v. B. F. Goodrich Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Davis v. Bank of AtkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Haville v. PearrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Berringer v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hargis v. HargisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Renault Central, Inc. v. International Imports of Fayetteville, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Colvin v. ColvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Hargis v. HargisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Wilkins v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982