RAM Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohde

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.*

Appellant argues that the district court erred by granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Because the district court properly concluded that appellant cannot maintain a subrogation action against respondent, we affirm.

FACTS

JD Property Management owns a business property that consists of three separate units. Respondent Rusty Rohde rented one of the units to operate Studio 71 Salon. Appellant RAM Mutual Insurance Company insured the property.

On February 4, 2008, a water line to a pedicure chair at Studio 71 burst, causing damage to the property. RAM paid JD…