Legal Opinion

Whole Living, Inc. v. Tolman

District Court, D. Utah

Decided November 9, 2004No. 2:03-cr-00272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED MOTION TO QUASH PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PRIOR TRO ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC TO DATES OF ORIGINATION

STEWART, District Judge.

This matter is before the court for consideration of Defendants’ Amended Motion to Quash Preliminary Injunction and Prior TRO Nunc Pro Tunc to Dates of Origination.

I. INTRODUCTION

Since April 2, 2003, Defendants have been enjoined from using Plaintiffs’ formulas promotional and sales materials and, pursuant to a non-compete clause in a consulting contract, Defendant Don Tol-man has been enjoined from competition with Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Castleglen, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Lifevantage CorporationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API