Legal Opinion
Keil v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 13, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 87 CV 73152 DTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Virginia M. Morgan’s Report and Recommendation of November 21, 1988 that third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment be denied. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation.
Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) states:
Within ten days after being served with a copy [of the magistrate’s report and recommendation], any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and the recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993