Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1982No. 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition to amend her complaint on the ground that the amendment would plead a new cause of action after the statute of limitations had run. Appellant argues that the amendment would only amplify the original cause of action. We do not agree, and therefore affirm.

The accident out of which this case arises occurred on July 26, 1976. This action was commenced on July 6, 1978, by writ of summons, Pa.R.C.P. 1007(1), and the complaint was filed on November 9, 1978.

The first count of the complaint sought damages for appellant’s minor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Junk v. East End Fire DepartmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Keystone Building Corp. v. Lincoln Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Shenandoah Borough v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Del Turco v. Peoples Home Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Boarts v. McCordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Walder v. LobelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Stulz v. BoswellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Hodgen v. SummersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API