Legal Opinion
In re Sony Corp. SXRD Rear Projection Television Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 22, 2010No. 09-MD-2102 (RPP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., District Judge.
On May 21, 2010, the Court ordered Counsel for the plaintiffs in Meserole, et al. v. Sony Corp., et al.,1 Milberg LLP, by Leigh *511Smith, Sanford Dumain and Jennifer Czeisler, Lax LLP, by Robert Lax, and Lange & Koncius LLP, by Joseph Lange and Jeffrey Koncius (hereinafter “Counsel for the Meserole Plaintiffs”), to show cause why certain statements contained in the Second Amended Complaint and made on the record do not constitute violations of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At issue here are statements purportedly from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Pennie & Edmonds LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Lee Nuwesra, Esq., Ernesto Forbes v. Merrill Lynch, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Yolanda D'Apuzzo and Anthony DibiaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Corporate Printing Co. v. New York Typographical Union No. 6District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011