Legal Opinion
Howard v. Millard Refrigerated Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 22, 2007No. 04-2601-JARPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 56). In this motion, defendant seeks summary judgment on plaintiffs retaliation and interference claims under the Family Medical Leave Act 1 (“FMLA”) and plaintiffs whistleblower claim under Kansas state law. 2 The matter is fully briefed, and the Court is now prepared to rule. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment.
I. Uncontroverted…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bones v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jason & Elizabeth Brooks v. Bpm Senior Living CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Ward v. Wesley Medical Center, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025