Feineigle v. Pennsylvania State Police
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
Trooper William Feineigle appeals from an order of the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police (Commissioner) denying Fei-neigle’s claim for benefits under the Heart and Lung Act (Act).1 We affirm.
Feineigle is a member of the Pennsylvania State Police. Pursuant to field regulations, all members of the Pennsylvania State Police are required to qualify with weapons on a semi-annual basis.
Field regulation 9-2 (FR 9-2), governing weapons qualification and familiarization, includes specific details regarding the weapons, ammunition and positions which members must utilize when…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Colyer v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- McCommons v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Griffin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Justice v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Duffy v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997