Legal Opinion

McCommons v. Pennsylvania State Police

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1994No. 2057 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Corporal Paul T. McCommons (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police (Commissioner) denying Claimant’s claim for benefits under the Heart and Lung Act (Act). 1 We affirm.

Claimant is a latent fingerprint examiner with the Pennsylvania State Police. He is also President of the Pennsylvania State Troopers Association (PSTA) and chairman of the Fraternal Order of Police Grievance Board. On March 19, 1992, Claimant was injured in a car accident while en route to Harrisburg for a meeting of the joint grievance committee. The joint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wisniewski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Colyer v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Adams v. Lawrence Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Buchanan v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Crouse v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Allen v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. McLaughlin v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Donnini v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Feineigle v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API