Legal Opinion

United States v. Sturm

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 8, 1987No. Crim. A. 86-421-WDPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM UPON ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

WOODLOCK, District Judge.

This is a repossession dispute which ripened into a criminal proceeding.

I denied the defendant’s “Motion for Judgment of Acquittal,” after a jury verdict finding him guilty on Count One of attempted extortion under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and guilty on Count Two of violation of the bank felony statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The principal question raised by that motion was whether the jury could properly conclude that the defendant’s lender, the Worcester County Institute for Savings (“WCIS” or “Bank”), was put in fear of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. James Scott PendergraftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. John Andrew SturmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re Cellular Information Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  4. Hall American Center Associates Ltd. Partnership v. DickDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
  5. United States v. MavroulesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API