Legal Opinion

Anding v. Byrd-Harmon Drilling Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1940No. 5640PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The oil wells situated on a 5-acre leasehold estate in Rusk County, owned by A. F. Anding, plaintiff below, having been drilled too deep, ceased producing oil. To recondition or plug back, so as to cut off the salt water, required the services of a cable tool rig to pull or lift the tubing; a derrick to which the cable tool rig is attached ; and equipment to pump cement down through the tubing. Byrd-Harmon Drilling Company, Inc., -defendant below, owner and operator of a standard cable tool rig, was employed by plaintiff to furnish certain labor and operate its rig in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. HillebrandtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Dodson v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. BuschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Community Natural Gas Co. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. E. L. Martin, Inc. v. KyserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamill v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API