Legal Opinion
Hoehn v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 8, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-1450(JDB)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
This negligence action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) arises out of an automobile accident in which a patient at Walter Reed Army Medical Center (“WRAMC”) lost control of her vehicle while driving home from the hospital following chemotherapy treatment, and collided with a vehicle in which plaintiffs Marie Rosalind Salcedo Hoehn and Victoria Hoehn were passengers. Plaintiffs allege that WRAMC was negligent in permitting the patient, allegedly without adequate warning, to drive home following the administration of intravenous drugs allegedly…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Richard Allgeier, Maria D. Boldrick, Intervening v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davis v. South Nassau Communities HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Leavitt v. Brockton Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Davis v. Grant Park Nursing Home LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Adler v. Vision Lab Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Gilbert v. MiodovnikDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.