Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Payne
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s assured purchased from defendant a substance known as “condensed smoke.” The substance exploded injuring two boys. Actions for damages were commenced by the injured in California. Defendant was notified of the commencement of the actions and refused to defend. Plaintiff settled said actions for substantial sums and here, as subrogee, prosecutes this indemnity action to recover the amounts so paid and its costs and expenses there incurred. Defendant admits the reasonableness of the amounts of the settlements.
For decision is the question as to whether this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, a Corp. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- American Export Lines, Owner Pro Hac Vice of the S.S. Exmouth v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Nelson v. SponbergWashington Supreme Court · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Portland v. George D. Ward & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- United Boatbuilders, Inc. v. Tempo Products Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Pyle v. Wolf CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1972
- In Re Yamashita-Shinnihon KisenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969