Legal Opinion
In Re Elstien
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 27, 1999No. 19-05677PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
RONALD BARLIANT, Bankruptcy Judge.
Two taxing authorities have moved for various forms of relief in this Chapter 13 case because the Debtor did not properly schedule their claims and falsely answered questions on his statement of financial affairs. Before filing his petition, Debtor Morris J. Elstien had been notified that the United States of America, on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), proposed to assess a “trust fund recovery penalty” of $553,427.50, and the Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDR”) had notified him of its claims for sales and trust fund taxes.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Lawrence Tractor Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In the Matter of Phyllis Maxine Pence, Debtor. Appeal of Pacesetter Bank of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- In the Matter Of: Warren C. Chappell and Barbara A. Chappell, Doing Business as Mister Photographer, Debtors, Appeal Of: Homebanc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. Stemple (In Re Stemple)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- In Re NewmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Department of the Treasury for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Galarza PaganDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- In re PfetzerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Huwang v. Hillside TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.