Legal Opinion

Shuster v. Vecchi

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1938No. 31,664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff, a gratuitous guest passenger in defendant’s car, was injured when the car in which she was thus riding came into violent collision with another driven by one Gervol, not a party to this canse. She recovered a verdict. Defendant’s alternative motion for judgment or new trial was denied, and he appeals.

The facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, may be thus summarized: The accident took place shortly after three o’clock on the afternoon of November 1, 1936, upon the trunk highway between Hibbing and Chisholm, some seven or eight…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guild v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Findley v. BrittenhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. SnugginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Kulla v. E. B. Crabtree Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API