Legal Opinion
Lumpkin v. Meskill
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 31, 1974No. Civ. No. 13716PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE DEFENDANT STATE OFFICIALS’ RESPONSE AND/OR MOTION TO DEEM THE MATTER ADMITTED
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
This motion presents a rather narrow and technical issue within the context of this complex school desegregation case instituted in 1970. Although narrow, the question at, issue does have substantial bearing on the speed with which this prolonged litigation can finally reach the state of adjudication and the length of the trial which must ultimately be conducted before a three-judge court of this district.1
*675Germa…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rosado v. WymanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
- Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Concerned Citizens of Belle Haven v. Belle Haven ClubDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Hersch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992