Legal Opinion

Butterworth & Lowe v. Kritzer Milling Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Newaygo; Palmer, J. Bill by Butterworth & Lowe against the Kritzer Milling Company and others to foreclose a mortgage. Prom a decree for complainant, defendant milling company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The complainant is a Michigan corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of machinery. The defendant milling company is a corporation *2engaged in the milling business at Newaygo. Each of these corporations was formed under Act No. 232 of the Public Acts of 1885.

The present bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage given by defendant to complainant under the following circumstances: Complainant was desirous of employing C. C. Kritzer, who was at the time manager of the defendant company. The defendant company had a line of credit at the Old National Bank amounting to about $12,000. The bank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Martin v. Niagara Falls Paper Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. St. Louis Drug Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Dewey v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McIndoe v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark v. E. C. Clark Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cole v. Cole Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Banker's Mutual Casualty Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Fifth National Bank v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Olson v. Warroad Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API