Dewey v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note given July 3, 1882, and made payable to the order of James M. Ashley, president of the Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Company. It was given for the sum of $9,120, and was signed by the Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Company, by B. E. Jarvis, auditor. It was indorsed by J. M. Ashley, president, and J. M. Ashley, payable to the order of T. D. Dewey, and by Dewey indorsed to the plaintiffs in this suit. Several payments were indorsed upon the note in 1883 and 1884. The amount remaining due and unpaid at the time of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- State Board of Agriculture v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
- The Rider Life Raft Co. v. . RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Manchester & Lawrence Railroad v. Concord RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
- Carson City Savings Bank v. Carson City Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Beach v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Cass County v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Towers Excelsior & Ginnery Co. v. InmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Chenoweth v. Pacific Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.